When to Choose Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap (And When Fast & Cheap Logistics Is OK)

If logistics had a personality test, this would be the question it asks before letting you touch the network:

Do you want it fast?

Do you want it cheap?

Or do you want it to actually work?

Because despite how often it’s asked in meetings, Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap is not a philosophical debate. It’s a design decision. One that quietly determines whether your supply chain scales, stabilises, or slowly eats its own margin.

The problem isn’t that leaders don’t understand the trade-off.

It’s that they try to ignore it.

Somewhere along the way, many businesses convince themselves there must be one “right” service level that works for everything. All customers. All products. All lanes. All the time.

That belief is responsible for a lot of blown budgets, burnt teams, and very awkward board slides.

---

The triangle doesn’t care about your intentions

The Fast–Cheap–Good triangle has been around forever, but in logistics it behaves less like a theory and more like gravity.

You can fight it.

You can argue with it.

You can ask procurement to negotiate harder.

But you can’t escape it.

Every logistics movement sits in one of three corners:

• Fast & Good – premium, reliable, predictable.

• Good & Cheap – slower, consolidated, cost-efficient.

• Fast & Cheap – volatile, fragile, and usually misunderstood.

The mistake is not choosing one. The mistake is choosing the same one everywhere.

Why this matters now more than ever:

McKinsey research shows supply-chain disruptions now last 2–3x longer than pre-2020 averages, meaning fragile service models fail harder and recover slower. Thin networks don’t bounce back – they break.

The failure mode isn’t choosing the “wrong” corner.

It’s pretending the same corner works everywhere.

When to Choose Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap (And When Fast & Cheap Logistics Is OK).

---

Why this matters more now than five years ago

Customer expectations didn’t just rise. They split.

Data from multiple consumer and B2B studies shows:

• McKinsey & Company reports that over 60% of ecommerce customers now expect delivery within two days in dense metro markets, driven by last-mile competition and marketplace-led service benchmarks (The New Rules of E-commerce Delivery).

• PwC finds that more than 70% of consumers are willing to wait longer for delivery when the option is clearly communicated and priced lower, highlighting that transparency matters as much as speed (Experience Is Everything: Here’s How to Get It Right).

• Deloitte shows that B2B buyers consistently rank delivery reliability and order completeness ahead of raw speed, particularly in replenishment and industrial supply chains where predictability protects production and inventory planning (Global Supply Chain & Operations Survey).

Translation: different customers want different things, often from the same business.

Trying to serve them all with one logistics posture is how networks become expensive, noisy, and brittle.

The Transport Works way to choose the right corner

Instead of arguing “fast vs cheap”, high-performing supply chains ask a better question:

What corner of the triangle is this lane actually allowed to sit in?

Here’s how that thinking plays out in the real world.

---

Ecommerce vs B2B - when the brand is literally the box

Ecommerce: Fast & Good by default, Good & Cheap by design

Ecommerce is unforgiving because delivery isn’t support – it’s part of the product.

Research consistently shows:

• PwC reports that over 90% of online shoppers consider delivery speed and reliability as a key factor before completing a purchase, making logistics performance a core driver of conversion and brand trust (Future of CX / Experience Is Everything).

• Metapack found that a single late delivery can reduce repeat purchase intent by more than 30%, even when the product itself meets expectations (State of E-commerce Delivery).

• Convey shows that WISMO (“Where Is My Order?”) enquiries spike sharply once deliveries miss the promised window, driving higher contact-centre costs, manual tracking work, and downstream customer dissatisfaction (Customer Experience in Delivery Report).

For ecommerce networks:

• Fast & Good belongs on core metro lanes, high-margin SKUs, subscription customers, and competitive categories where switching is one click away.
  

• Good & Cheap works for economy options, long-tail SKUs, cross-border shipments, and rural deliveries where expectations are set properly at checkout.

Fast & Cheap here is a trap. You might save a few dollars per parcel, but you’ll pay for it in reships, refunds, contact centre load, and churn.

B2B: Good & Cheap does the heavy lifting

B2B logistics lives in a different reality.

Production planners don’t care if a pallet arrives at 9am or 11am.They care if it arrives complete, within the agreed window, and without drama.

That’s why:

• Good & Cheap is the backbone of most B2B replenishment networks.

• Consolidation, scheduled linehaul, and predictable delivery windows protect cost-to-serve and inventory planning.
  

• Fast & Good is reserved for true exceptions: line-down risk, contractual penalties, or safety-critical freight.

Fast & Cheap only belongs in low-risk, low-value scenarios where failure won’t ripple through operations.

---

Perishable vs durable - shelf life changes everything

Perishable: Fast & Good or don’t pretend

Perishable logistics doesn’t tolerate indecision.

Cold chain data shows that:

• Even short delays increase spoilage risk, energy consumption, and write-offs.

• Temperature excursions often invalidate product entirely, not just delay revenue.

• Retailers quickly lose trust in suppliers with inconsistent delivery performance.

For perishables:

• Fast & Good isn’t premium. It’s baseline.

• Delays don’t just cost sales, they destroy inventory.

• Good & Cheap only works in very controlled environments, such as frozen goods with long shelf life and robust buffers.

Fast & Cheap here isn’t brave. It’s reckless.

Durable goods: flexibility is your advantage

Durable products give you room to design smarter networks:

• Time sensitivity is commercial, not chemical.

• Stock can wait without dying.

• Customers often prioritise price over immediacy.

That’s where Good & Cheap shines:

• Planned replenishment

• Project staging

• Low-margin SKUs

Fast & Good Logistics becomes a targeted tool for launches, urgent repairs, or high-value items where service is part of the promise.

---

Promotions vs BAU - when timing is the product

Promotions amplify everything.

Miss a delivery window during a campaign and you don’t just lose sales. You lose the moment.

Data from retail and FMCG consistently shows:

• Missed promo windows can wipe out the entire margin of a campaign.

• Late replenishment often creates a double hit: empty shelves during peak demand, followed by excess stock once demand collapses.

For promotions:

• Fast & Good is non-negotiable for initial fills and hero SKUs.

• Good & Cheap can return once demand stabilises.

For BAU:

• Good & Cheap should dominate.

• Over-servicing everyday lanes with premium speed quietly inflates total cost to serve without improving customer outcomes.

Metro vs rural - density changes the physics

Urban delivery benefits from:

• Higher drop density

• Better asset utilisation

• More carrier optionality

That’s why two-day delivery targets of 70–75%+ are achievable in metro areas.

Rural networks are different:

• Fewer drops

• Longer distances

• More handovers

Benchmarks show rural two-day performance expectations are often closer to 50–55%, even in well-run networks.

Trying to force Fast & Cheap into rural lanes usually results in “fast when it works, chaotic when it doesn’t”.

Good & Cheap Logistics, with honest ETAs and smart consolidation, is how trust is built outside the cities.

---

So… When Is Fast & Cheap Logistics Actually OK?

Fast & Cheap is not evil. It’s just dangerous when misunderstood.

It can work when:

• The product is low value.

• The customer is price-driven and informed.

• The lane is non-critical to brand perception.

• Total Cost to Serve modelling confirms the risk is contained.

Used sparingly, Fast & Cheap Logistics is a tactical lever. Used broadly, it becomes a network-wide liability.

Fast & Cheap is a scalpel, not a blanket policy.

---

Fast vs Cheap vs Good – The Transport Works Decision Matrix

Use this when someone asks, “Can’t we just make everything cheaper?”

Short answer: no.

Longer answer: pick the right fight.

Network reality	What’s actually moving	The corner you’re allowed to choose	Why this doesn’t blow up later
Ecommerce, high-density metro	Fashion, beauty, electronics to impatient city customers	Fast & Good	Delivery is part of the brand. Miss the window and you don’t just lose the sale, you lose the customer.
Ecommerce, regional or rural	General merchandise to low-drop-density zones	Good & Cheap	Customers tolerate slower when you’re honest. Pretending rural can be “metro fast” is how margins disappear.
B2B, business-as-usual	Planned industrial or wholesale replenishment	Good & Cheap	Predictability beats speed. Reliability protects cost-to-serve and keeps planners sane.
B2B, production at risk	Line-down spares, urgent MRO, contractual penalties	Fast & Good	When downtime costs more per hour than freight costs per pallet, this isn’t a debate.
Perishable retail supply	Fresh food, temperature-sensitive, expiry-driven goods	Fast & Good	Late equals waste. There’s no recovery play for spoiled product.
Durable, low-margin goods	Hardware, fittings, bulky slow movers	Good & Cheap	These products don’t rot on the dock. Time flexibility is your friend here.
Promotional go-live	Campaign launches, catalogues, peak events	Fast & Good	Miss the window and you miss the moment. Promotions don’t wait for late freight.
Low-priority, low-risk lanes	Infrequent, non-critical, low-value movements	Good & Cheap or Fast & Cheap (locked down)	You can trade service for cost only when failure won’t echo across the network.

The decision most teams still avoid AND How Transport Works uses this

This matrix isn’t a poster. It’s a permission framework.

It gives supply chain leaders the confidence to say:

• “This lane is not allowed to be Fast & Cheap.”

• “This customer doesn’t need Fast & Good.”

• “This promo absolutely does.”

Most logistics pain doesn’t come from bad carriers. It comes from using the wrong service philosophy in the wrong place, then acting surprised when reality sends the invoice.

---

Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap (And When Fast & Cheap Is Actually OK) FAQs

What does Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap mean in logistics?

Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap describes the core trade-off in logistics service design. Fast & Good prioritises speed and reliability at a higher cost, while Good & Cheap prioritises consistency and lower cost with longer lead times. The right choice depends on the product, customer expectations, channel, and risk tolerance. There is no single “best” option across an entire supply chain.

Why can’t supply chains be fast, cheap, and good at the same time?

Because speed, cost, and reliability draw on the same constrained resources: capacity, labour, time, and resilience. Optimising for all three simultaneously usually means one of them quietly fails. In practice, trying to be fast, cheap, and good everywhere leads to fragile networks, rising exception costs, and declining delivery performance.

When should businesses prioritise Fast & Good logistics?

Fast & Good should be prioritised when delivery performance directly affects demand, trust, or operational continuity. This includes ecommerce in competitive markets, promotional launches, perishable goods, urgent B2B shipments, and any scenario where late delivery causes immediate revenue loss, spoilage, or customer churn.

When is Good & Cheap the smarter logistics choice?

Good & Cheap is ideal for predictable, non-urgent flows such as B2B replenishment, durable goods, bulk movements, and business-as-usual operations. It focuses on reliability, consolidation, and cost efficiency rather than speed, helping reduce total cost to serve while maintaining consistent delivery outcomes.

Is Fast & Cheap ever acceptable in a supply chain?

Fast & Cheap can be acceptable in tightly controlled situations where the product is low value, the customer explicitly accepts risk, the lane is non-critical to brand perception, and the total cost to serve has been modelled. It should be used as a tactical exception, not a default strategy, because volatility and failure costs escalate quickly when applied broadly.

---

Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap Is a Routing Rulebook

Fast & Good vs Good & Cheap (And When Fast & Cheap Is OK) isn’t a philosophical debate. It’s a network design discipline.

The operators who win:

• Segment by channel, product, geography, and moment

• Assign the correct triangle corner deliberately

• Keep Fast & Cheap on a very short leash

  
  

Do that, and something quietly powerful happens.

Service improves.

Noise drops.

Margins stop arguing with operations.

And the supply chain finally starts behaving like a system - not a series of reactions.

 Everyone else keeps arguing about rates while the triangle quietly runs the business.

Transport Works. Because your supply chain won’t fix itself.

Let's Chat

---

Insights from Danyul Gleeson, Founder & Logistics Chaos Tamer-in-Chief at Transport Works

Danyul has been in the trenches - warehouses where pick paths were sketched on pizza boxes and boardrooms where the “supply chain strategy” was a shrug. He built Transport Works to flip that script: a 4PL that turns broken systems into competitive advantage. His mission? Always Delivering - without the chaos.

Sources and References

Customer expectations, delivery speed, and purchase behaviour

• McKinsey & Company – The New Rules of E-commerce Delivery Analysis of rising two-day delivery expectations in metro markets and the commercial impact of delivery speed and reliability on conversion and repeat purchase.

• PwC – Experience Is Everything: Here’s How to Get It Right Consumer research showing that delivery speed, reliability, and clear communication influence purchasing decisions, and that many customers will trade speed for price when expectations are set upfront.

• Metapack – State of E-commerce Delivery Research demonstrating the impact of late delivery on repeat purchase intent and customer loyalty in ecommerce.

B2B buyer priorities and service design

• Deloitte – Global Supply Chain & Operations Survey Survey data showing that B2B buyers prioritise delivery reliability, order completeness, and predictability over raw delivery speed in replenishment and industrial supply chains.

• Gartner – Customer Fulfilment Segmentation and Service Design Research highlighting the cost and complexity risks of uniform service models and recommending segmented logistics strategies by customer value and urgency.

Perishable logistics, cold chain, and delivery risk

• FAO – Global Food Losses and Food Waste Report Data on spoilage and loss driven by delays and temperature excursions in food supply chains.

• IQVIA – Cold Chain Management in Pharmaceuticals Analysis of how transport delays and temperature deviations lead to product write-offs and compliance risk in pharmaceutical logistics.

Promotions, peak demand, and delivery timing

• McKinsey & Company – Winning in Retail Promotions Research showing how missed delivery windows during promotions erode margin and distort inventory performance.

• NielsenIQ – Retail Availability and Promotional Effectiveness Data linking on-time delivery and shelf availability to promotional ROI and sales uplift.

Metro vs rural delivery performance

• Parcel Perform – E-commerce Delivery Benchmark Reports (US, AU, NZ) Benchmark data comparing metro and rural delivery performance, transit times, and service expectations.

• US Postal Service OIG – Rural Delivery Performance Analysis Insights into structural challenges affecting rural delivery speed and reliability.

Total Cost to Serve, volatility, and logistics ROI

• Gartner – Reframing Logistics Procurement Around Value, Not Cost Research showing logistics ROI improvements when organisations move away from rate-only decisions toward value- and service-based models.

• AIMMS – Cost-to-Serve Analytics for Modern Supply Chains Analysis of how service volatility and misaligned logistics choices inflate total cost to serve and erode margin.

Customer service impact and WISMO costs

• Convey – Customer Experience in Delivery Report Evidence showing spikes in WISMO (“Where Is My Order?”) enquiries when delivery promises are missed, increasing customer service cost and reputational damage.

• Harvard Business Review – How Operational Failures Damage Customer Lifetime Value Analysis of how delivery failures affect customer trust, repeat purchasing, and long-term revenue.